In the first speech, I taught How to Build a Kite. I basically did a very good job on this speech; it was a successful speech that ended with the kite failing. I taught the audience fairly well, but I had no enhancing tone, visual aids, and not much eye contact. I think that this was the speech that I improved most on, and the speech that I practiced well on. I had no problem saying the materials, the steps on how to build a kite, and the alternatives. This speech was overall, an improving, demonstrative speech needing more tone. However, knowing the fact that it can be perfectly achieved, it needs more work on tone, and attraction.
The second speech which was a classic origami demonstration, was a speech that was distracted and not as improving as the first one. I needed to practice more, I needed to connect the conclusion to the introduction. This speech was a bit rusheed, but if practiced, it would be perfect. Body language was sufficient in this speech, and in addition, it produced eye contact among all the audience, instead of the teacher. This speech was a bit long, it needs minor modifications, and the more practice needed. Overall, this speech was a complicated, quick speech with exceeding amounts of interactions with the audience. I especially loved the parts in which i asked "right?", and it felt professional.
I think your first one was solid. The 2nd one was interesting, but you COULD do it better. The easy way is to do the first speech again—doing the 2nd one again would be the better challenge. I'd prefer that one, but your call. 15/15
ReplyDelete